Englander Institute for Precision Medicine

The Effect of Corticosteroids on Prostate Cancer Outcome Following Treatment with Enzalutamide: A Multivariate Analysis of the Phase III AFFIRM Trial.

TitleThe Effect of Corticosteroids on Prostate Cancer Outcome Following Treatment with Enzalutamide: A Multivariate Analysis of the Phase III AFFIRM Trial.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2022
AuthorsZhao JL, Fizazi K, Saad F, Chi KN, Taplin M-E, Sternberg CN, Armstrong AJ, de Bono JS, Duggan WT, Scher HI
JournalClin Cancer Res
Volume28
Issue5
Pagination860-869
Date Published2022 Mar 01
ISSN1557-3265
KeywordsAdrenal Cortex Hormones, Antineoplastic Agents, Benzamides, Disease-Free Survival, Humans, Male, Multivariate Analysis, Nitriles, Phenylthiohydantoin, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant, Treatment Outcome
Abstract

PURPOSE: The clinical impact of concurrent corticosteroid use (CCU) on enzalutamide-treated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. We investigated the association of CCU with overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and time to prostate-specific antigen progression (TTPP) in post-chemotherapy, enzalutamide-treated patients with mCRPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of AFFIRM (NCT00974311) with patients (n = 1,199) randomized 2:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo. Treatment group, CCU, and known prognostic factors were evaluated for impact on OS, rPFS, and TTPP using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. CCU was defined as "baseline" (use started at baseline) or "on-study" (baseline plus use that was started during the trial).

RESULTS: Enzalutamide significantly improved OS, rPFS, and TTPP independent of baseline CCU but was associated with inferior clinical outcomes when compared with no baseline CCU, including a shorter OS [10.8 months vs. not reached (NR); HR for use vs. no use, 2.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.79-2.54], rPFS (5.2 months vs. 8.0 months; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.29-1.72], and TTPP (4.6 months vs. 5.7 months; HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.25-1.81). These findings held in a multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline prognostic factors wherein baseline CCU was independently associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.43-2.04; P < 0.0001) and rPFS (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.48; P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mCRPC benefited from enzalutamide treatment independent of CCU, but CCU was associated with worse baseline prognostic factors and outcomes.

DOI10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1090
Alternate JournalClin Cancer Res
PubMed ID34965947
PubMed Central IDPMC9366341
Grant ListP50 CA092629 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
20YOUN22 / / Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award /
P30 CA008748 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
P50-CA92629 / GF / NIH HHS / United States
K12CA184746 / / Paul Calabresi Career Development Award for Clinical Oncology /

Weill Cornell Medicine Englander Institute for Precision Medicine 413 E 69th Street
Belfer Research Building
New York, NY 10021