Englander Institute for Precision Medicine

Outcomes of relapsed clinical stage I versus de novo metastatic testicular cancer patients: an analysis of the IGCCCG Update database.

TitleOutcomes of relapsed clinical stage I versus de novo metastatic testicular cancer patients: an analysis of the IGCCCG Update database.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2023
AuthorsLauritsen J, Sauvé N, Tryakin A, Jiang DMaria, Huddart R, Heng DYC, Terbuch A, Winquist E, Chovanec M, Hentrich M, Fankhauser CD, Shamash J, Del Muro XGarcia, Vaughn D, Heidenreich A, Sternberg CN, Sweeney C, Necchi A, Bokemeyer C, Bandak M, Jandari A, Collette L, Gillessen S, Beyer J, Daugaard G
JournalBr J Cancer
Volume129
Issue11
Pagination1759-1765
Date Published2023 Nov
ISSN1532-1827
KeywordsHumans, Male, Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Prognosis, Progression-Free Survival, Recurrence, Seminoma, Testicular Neoplasms
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance after orchiectomy is the preferred management in clinical stage I (CSI) germ-cell tumours (GCT) associated with a 15 to 30% relapse rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the IGCCCG Update database, we compared the outcomes of gonadal disseminated GCT relapsing from initial CSI to outcomes of patients with de novo metastatic GCT.

RESULTS: A total of 1014 seminoma (Sem) [298 (29.4%) relapsed from CSI, 716 (70.6%) de novo] and 3103 non-seminoma (NSem) [626 (20.2%) relapsed from CSI, 2477 (79.8%) de novo] were identified. Among Sem, no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were found between patients relapsing from CSI and de novo metastatic disease [5-year progression-free survival (5y-PFS) 87.6% versus 88.5%; 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) 93.2% versus 96.1%). Among NSem, PFS and OS were higher overall in relapsing CSI patients (5y-PFS 84.6% versus 80.0%; 5y-OS 93.3% versus 88.7%), but there were no differences within the same IGCCCG prognostic groups (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.70-1.12). Relapses in the intermediate or poor prognostic groups occurred in 11/298 (4%) Sem and 112/626 (18%) NSem.

CONCLUSION: Relapsing CSI GCT patients expect similar survival compared to de novo metastatic patients of the same ICCCCG prognostic group. Intermediate and poor prognosis relapses from initial CSI expose patients to unnecessary toxicity from more intensive treatments.

DOI10.1038/s41416-023-02443-3
Alternate JournalBr J Cancer
PubMed ID37777577
PubMed Central IDPMC10667594

Weill Cornell Medicine Englander Institute for Precision Medicine 413 E 69th Street
Belfer Research Building
New York, NY 10021