Englander Institute for Precision Medicine

Predicting inpatient mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A machine learning approach.

TitlePredicting inpatient mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A machine learning approach.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2023
AuthorsCharilaou P, Mohapatra S, Doukas S, Kohli M, Radadiya D, Devani K, Broder A, Elemento O, Lukin DJ, Battat R
JournalJ Gastroenterol Hepatol
Volume38
Issue2
Pagination241-250
Date Published2023 Feb
ISSN1440-1746
KeywordsAdult, Colitis, Ulcerative, Humans, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Inpatients, Machine Learning, Pneumonia, Retrospective Studies
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data are lacking on predicting inpatient mortality (IM) in patients admitted for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IM is a critical outcome; however, difficulty in its prediction exists due to infrequent occurrence. We assessed IM predictors and developed a predictive model for IM using machine-learning (ML).

METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2005-2017), we extracted adults admitted for IBD. After ML-guided predictor selection, we trained and internally validated multiple algorithms, targeting minimum sensitivity and positive likelihood ratio (+LR) ≥ 80% and ≥ 3, respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) compared algorithm performance. The best performing algorithm was additionally trained and validated for an IBD-related surgery sub-cohort. External validation was done using NIS 2018.

RESULTS: In 398 426 adult IBD admissions, IM was 0.32% overall, and 0.87% among the surgical cohort (n = 40 784). Increasing age, ulcerative colitis, IBD-related surgery, pneumonia, chronic lung disease, acute kidney injury, malnutrition, frailty, heart failure, blood transfusion, sepsis/septic shock and thromboembolism were associated with increased IM. The QLattice algorithm, provided the highest performance model (+LR: 3.2, 95% CI 3.0-3.3; area-under-curve [AUC]:0.87, 85% sensitivity, 73% specificity), distinguishing IM patients by 15.6-fold when comparing high to low-risk patients. The surgical cohort model (+LR: 8.5, AUC: 0.94, 85% sensitivity, 90% specificity), distinguished IM patients by 49-fold. Both models performed excellently in external validation. An online calculator (https://clinicalc.ai/im-ibd/) was developed allowing bedside model predictions.

CONCLUSIONS: An online prediction-model calculator captured > 80% IM cases during IBD-related admissions, with high discriminatory effectiveness. This allows for risk stratification and provides a basis for assessing interventions to reduce mortality in high-risk patients.

DOI10.1111/jgh.16029
Alternate JournalJ Gastroenterol Hepatol
PubMed ID36258306
PubMed Central IDPMC10099396

Weill Cornell Medicine Englander Institute for Precision Medicine 413 E 69th Street
Belfer Research Building
New York, NY 10021