Englander Institute for Precision Medicine

A systematic review and meta-analysis of germline BRCA mutations in pancreatic cancer patients identifies global and racial disparities in access to genetic testing.

TitleA systematic review and meta-analysis of germline BRCA mutations in pancreatic cancer patients identifies global and racial disparities in access to genetic testing.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2023
AuthorsPaiella S, Azzolina D, Gregori D, Malleo G, Golan T, Simeone DM, Davis MB, Vacca PG, Crovetto A, Bassi C, Salvia R, Biankin AV, Casolino R
JournalESMO Open
Volume8
Issue2
Pagination100881
Date Published2023 Apr
ISSN2059-7029
KeywordsBRCA2 Protein, Genetic Testing, Humans, Mutation, Pancreatic Neoplasms
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) can inform pancreatic cancer (PC) risk and treatment but most of the available information is derived from white patients. The ethnic and geographic variability of gBRCAm prevalence and of germline BRCA (gBRCA) testing uptake in PC globally is largely unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a systematic review and prevalence meta-analysis of gBRCA testing and gBRCAm prevalence in PC patients stratified by ethnicity. The main outcome was the distribution of gBRCA testing uptake across diverse populations worldwide. Secondary outcomes included: geographic distribution of gBRCA testing uptake, temporal analysis of gBRCA testing uptake in ethnic groups, and pooled proportion of gBRCAm stratified by ethnicity. The study is listed under PROSPERO registration number #CRD42022311769.

RESULTS: A total of 51 studies with 16 621 patients were included. Twelve of the studies (23.5%) enrolled white patients only, 10 Asians only (19.6%), and 29 (56.9%) included mixed populations. The pooled prevalence of white, Asian, African American, and Hispanic patients tested per study was 88.7%, 34.8%, 3.6%, and 5.2%, respectively. The majority of included studies were from high-income countries (HICs) (64; 91.2%). Temporal analysis showed a significant increase only in white and Asians patients tested from 2000 to present (P < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of gBRCAm was: 3.3% in white, 1.7% in Asian, and negligible (<0.3%) in African American and Hispanic patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Data on gBRCA testing and gBRCAm in PC derive mostly from white patients and from HICs. This limits the interpretation of gBRCAm for treating PC across diverse populations and implies substantial global and racial disparities in access to BRCA testing in PC.

DOI10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100881
Alternate JournalESMO Open
PubMed ID36822114
PubMed Central IDPMC10163165
Grant ListC29717/A17263 / CRUK_ / Cancer Research UK / United Kingdom
C29717/A18484 / CRUK_ / Cancer Research UK / United Kingdom
C596/A18076 / CRUK_ / Cancer Research UK / United Kingdom
C596/A20921 / CRUK_ / Cancer Research UK / United Kingdom
A23526 / CRUK_ / Cancer Research UK / United Kingdom
103721/Z/14/Z / WT_ / Wellcome Trust / United Kingdom
/ MRC_ / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom

Weill Cornell Medicine Englander Institute for Precision Medicine 413 E 69th Street
Belfer Research Building
New York, NY 10021